Prosecutors are refusing to pursue the case where a paparazzo pressed charges against Britney Spears after she ran over his foot with her car last year, saying the paparazzo himself was to blame for any injury.

It's been a while since we've seen a glowing Britney. She used to have it all. Now she's in the midst of a fierce battle for custody of her kids and fresh from a stretch at a psychiatric hospital. So where did it all go wrong?
 
Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley's office reviewed a videotape and photos of the incident, which don't show the photographer being hit. The report also describes a chaotic scene surrounding Spears, with photographers on all sides of her car and "a lot of noise and confusion.“

After reviewing police records and a videotape of the incident last year, Deputy District Attorney Joseph D. Shidler wrote Friday that the "only way the victim's foot could have been where the video indicates it to be was by the victim placing it in that location.“ The photographer, who was not identified in the report, filed a criminal complaint against Spears in early May, nearly six months after the alleged incident. The report describes Spears' as "driving at an extremely slow rate of speed and in a straight path.“ Spears told police she didn't remember the incident, and prosecutors believed her. "There was much commotion and noise at the time and there is no proof that the suspect was aware of what happened,“ she said.